WASHINGTON, Jan 7 : (AFP) -- The
US military is reviewing several incidents in which civilians may have been
killed in coalition air strikes against Islamic State jihadists in Iraq and
Syria, officials said Tuesday.
The comments marked the first time the US military has
acknowledged that the air war may have exacted a toll on civilians.
US Central Command, which is overseeing the air campaign,
initially looked into 18 cases and concluded 13 were not credible but five
merited further review. Of those, two incidents -- one in Iraq and one in Syria
-- prompted formal investigations, defense officials told AFP.
The current probes involved one case that occurred as
recently as December 26, officials said.
"What I know is that Central Command is
investigating several (of) what they believe to be credible allegations of
civilian casualties," Pentagon spokesman Rear Admiral John Kirby told
reporters.
"This is something we always take seriously. We are
very mindful of trying to mitigate the risk to civilians every time we operate,
everywhere we operate."His comments marked a shift as the Pentagon had
insisted for months they had not confirmed any instance of civilian deaths from
the bombing raids.
Human rights organizations, however, have previously
reported that dozens of civilians have been killed in the US-led air strikes,
mainly in Syria.
The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights
said in October that 32 civilians were killed after the first month of
coalition strikes in Syria, as well as 467 fighters from the Islamic State
group.
"It would be highly
unlikely that there would be no civilian casualties at this stage in the air
campaign," said one US defense official, speaking on condition of
anonymity.
But the American military was not on the ground in Syria
and had a relatively small presence in Iraq, so it was difficult to say
definitively how many civilians may have been killed in the air war so far, the
official added.
Credible evidence
Allegations of possible civilian casualties had come from
a range of sources including the military's own reviews and internal reporting,
the State Department, and accounts by news media and non-governmental
organizations, said Major Curtis Kellogg, a spokesman for US Central Command.
"A source is generally deemed to be credible if the
source provides verifiable information, such as corroborating statements,
photographs or documentation that can help us determine whether an allegation
is founded," Kellogg said.
But the two formal investigations currently under way
"are the direct result of our own internal review process and not the
result of allegations received from outside of DoD (the Department of
Defense)," he said in a statement.Investigations can cover areas including
"technical, mechanical or human errors involved in the strikes," he
said.
"The current environment on the ground in Iraq and
Syria makes investigating these allegations extremely challenging. Traditional
investigatory methods, such as interviewing witnesses and examining the site,
are not typically available," he said.
As of mid-December, commanders said more than 1,300 air
strikes had been carried out in Syria and Iraq. The vast majority of the raids
have been conducted by US fighter jets, bombers and drones.
Air strikes against the IS group in Iraq began on August
8 and were extended into Syria on September 23.
No comments:
Post a Comment